For every conference, ATypI assembles a Review Team to judge the many proposals for presentations, workshops and exhibitions that are submitted. This year we received 267 proposals, from which the Curatorial Team (see below) selects around 100.
“The best part of being an ATypI reviewer is getting a front-row seat to all the exciting innovations in the industry. This year’s focus on AI brought an incredible wave of fresh, forward-thinking proposals, so much to learn and be inspired by.”
Sofie Beier (Copenhagen team chair)
“The theme Fluidity—Beyond the Static Form transcends mere words; it embodies the essence of adaptability, movement, and conceptual richness found within the proposals.
Serving as an ATypI reviewer and program committee member this year has been a challenge. The submissions were not only substantial but also reflected a remarkable depth of thought and innovation of the researchers. The diversity of perspectives and the caliber of work reaffirm the ever-evolving nature of typographic discourse, making this selection process as inspiring as it was demanding.”
Nada Abdallah
“I think I have reviewed submissions for every conference for nearly 20 years now.
The quality of submissions was good this year. I felt that there were quite a lot fewer awful submissions than usual, although also somewhat fewer outstanding must-see-this submissions.”
Thomas Phiney
“Thrilling to be part of the review team an ATypI. It’s exciting to read first hand researches and projects that might make a change in education, industry and society worldwide.”
Leonardo Vázquez
It has been a pleasure reviewing the submissions this year—notable for their mix of familiar and new voices, which have all come to the fore in the programme.
Clare Bell
I have observed a growing number of participants from Asia, especially China, indicating an increasing exchange of typographic ideas between East and West. Academic research on Chinese typography, the practices of AI-generated Chinese fonts, and the revival of historical Chinese typefaces are becoming more structured. These trends mark a significant step toward the full globalisation of typography.
Xunchang Cheng
This year’s submissions showcased deeper research and a more diverse range of scripts than ever before. Some were explored from a non-native perspective, which I believe adds valuable new dimensions to the discussion. AI-related topics were also more prominent this year. As an industry, we must find ways to work with AI, starting with understanding the technology itself—its potential, limitations, and challenges. I hope AtypI can serve as a foundation not only for expanding our knowledge but also for fostering a constructive perspective on emerging technologies, including those yet to be discovered.
Min-Young Kim
This year’s ATypI conference submissions were truly incredible. It was the first time I have reviewed proposals for a conference, and I must say the diversity of ideas, the depth of research, and the level of talent was inspirational. It’s clear to me that our colleagues from all around the world have put great effort and passion into drafting these proposals, pushing the boundaries of our small but awesome industry, and each deserves recognition. The creativity, thoughtfulness, and fresh perspectives evident in these submissions promise engaging discussions, valuable insights, and groundbreaking advancements. This year’s conference in Copenhagen is shaping up to be one of the best. Hope to see y’all soon!
Jordan Bell
I was happy to see many types of proposals, including new technologies, current research, educational theory, and creative experimentation. I’m definitely looking forward to seeing these in person!
David Lemon
Curatorial Team
The Curatorial Team is Sofie Beier, Leonardo Vasquez, Nada Abdallah, Clare Bell, Xunchang Cheng, Liu Zhao, Ann Bessemans, and Tamye Riggs. Their role is to finalize the program selection based on the ratings by the Review Team, bearing in mind the conference theme as well a desire for diversity in subject matter and demographic backgrounds.